Skip to content

Digital asset regulation and tokenization in the United States

By Javier Yáñez López

Regulatory overview

Scope
Federal and state
Authorities
Regulatory index
Latest regulatory change

The United States combines federal securities, derivatives and anti-money laundering legislation with state permissions. Classification depends on the asset, contract, service and customers served. The SEC has established temporary relief for trading certain tokenized stocks, subject to specific conditions. GENIUS provides a stablecoin framework with its own implementation timetable. FinCEN registration, a state license and a securities exemption are not interchangeable permissions.

Index breakdown and sources

Score
Score by dimension
Framework clarityWeight: 25%Level: 3/4
Operational accessWeight: 25%Level: 4/4
TokenizationWeight: 20%Level: 3/4
Service breadthWeight: 20%Level: 3/4
International reachWeight: 10%Level: 1/4
Reason

Federal and state framework with access evidenced by public registers. The September 2026 SEC order establishes specific conditions for tokenized stock trading and liquidity providers, raising tokenization to 3. Operational infrastructure under that new route is not established here for anchor 4. GENIUS retains its own timetable; SEC proposals and CLARITY are not treated as effective permissions.

Limits

Temporary, narrow and conditional TSV exemption; it does not cover primary issuance or synthetic exposure. State permissions are not extrapolated nationally. FinCEN replaces neither securities nor state licensing requirements; GENIUS is not presented as a fully operational federal route.

Is crypto legal in the United States?

Yes. Businesses have regulated routes to operate with crypto-assets, under predictable rules. Federal and state framework with access evidenced by public registers.

In the Metlabs Regulatory Index it scores 76/100 and ranks 48 of 76 countries assessed (assessed October 4, 2026). See the country ranking

Key takeaways

  • The asset, offering and service require separate analysis; there is no single national license for every model.
  • FinCEN registration replaces neither state permissions nor securities requirements.
  • The September 2026 SEC exemption covers defined trading in tokenized stocks, not general initial offerings.
  • Token rights may differ from those of the underlying security, particularly where a third party is involved.
  • GENIUS, CLARITY and SEC proposals have distinct status and timetables; they are not presented as one effective regime.

Regulation by US state

Regulatory milestones

  1. New York virtual currency framework published

    The state register publishes the addition of Part 200 to Title 23 NYCRR. This is the basis of BitLicense, with state-level scope and its own requirements.

  2. First BitLicense granted to Circle

    DFS identifies 22 September as the approval date of the first BitLicense application, submitted by Circle Internet Financial. This is a New York market-access milestone, separate from federal permission.

  3. FinCEN guidance on virtual currency business models

    The guidance applies the money transmission framework to particular functions and facts. It distinguishes developing software from using it to accept and transmit value for others.

  4. GENIUS Act enacted

    The Act establishes a framework for payment stablecoin issuers, with requirements and deferred application. Enactment and general commencement are different dates.

  5. SEC staff statement on tokenized securities

    Staff distinguishes issuer and third-party tokenization models, including intermediated rights and synthetic exposures. The statement has no independent legal force.

  6. SEC digital asset interpretation becomes effective

    The release issued on March 17 is published and becomes effective on March 23. It distinguishes assets, digital securities and investment contracts.

  7. Federal Reserve payment account proposal

    The Board proposes a limited account for clearing and settling payments, without interest or credit, that does not expand legal eligibility, and asks for decisions on Tier 3 institutions to be paused.

  8. Treasury proposal on stablecoin issuance, offer and sale

    Treasury proposes rules under section 3 of GENIUS, after proposing in April the principles on the similarity of state regimes. Both remain proposals.

  9. Temporary tokenized stock trading exemption

    Order 34-106402 provides conditional TSV and specified liquidity-provider relief until September 2031, without a general primary issuance exemption.

  10. Treasury procedure for state framework certification

    Interim procedural rule under GENIUS. Acceptance of certifications depends on administrative approval; the text anticipates general application of the Act in January 2027.

  11. SEC crypto custody proposal

    The SEC proposes that registered investment advisers and regulated funds may hold crypto assets with state trust companies or through adviser self-custody, subject to conditions. Comments due by December 7, 2026.

  12. CFTC advance notice on retail crypto asset transactions

    The CFTC previews rules for leveraged, margined or financed retail crypto asset transactions and a purpose-built registered market. No rule text; comments due by December 14, 2026.

Get each month's regulatory changes by country

One email a month with the rules approved and taking effect in each jurisdiction, with the official source and the updated guide. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Frequently asked questions

There is no generic permission replacing assessment of every function and jurisdiction. Applicable federal securities, derivatives or money transmission rules must be considered alongside state requirements. A company’s state of incorporation does not by itself determine where it may provide services. Permissions should be mapped against the activity and intended clients.

No. Registration concerns the obligations of money services businesses within FinCEN’s framework. It does not establish securities or derivatives permission or replace applicable state licenses. Assessing a provider requires checking its activities and corresponding permissions, together with the exact identity of the registered entity.

Not necessarily. The SEC staff statement distinguishes tokenization models and synthetic exposures. The holder should check whether there is a share carrying rights against the original issuer, an intermediated right or a third-party obligation. Tracking the same price does not establish voting, dividend or equivalent insolvency rights. Contracts and the recording mechanism matter.

It should not be interpreted that way. Enacted in July 2025, the Act provides for deferred general application under section 20. Treasury identifies January 18, 2027, as the expected date; its state certification procedure does not itself authorize an issuer. Planning should verify the applicable date, regulator, permission and product conditions.

Not by itself. The assessment depends on activities, clients and the connection with the country. FinCEN guidance covers foreign providers conducting business wholly or substantially within the United States within its remit. Securities, derivatives and relevant state rules must also be assessed. A company’s address and server location do not settle territorial scope.

How to cite this guide

If you use this guide as a source in an article, academic paper or report, you can cite it as follows (APA style):

Yáñez López, J. (2026, October 18). Digital asset regulation and tokenization in the United States. Metlabs. https://metlabs.io/en/blockchain-regulation/united-states/

As featured in

CointelegraphInvesting.comEl EspañolEmprendedoresEl ObservadorCriptoNoticias