Skip to content

Digital asset regulation and tokenization in Sri Lanka

Regulatory overview

Scope
Sri Lanka
Authorities
Regulatory index
Latest regulatory change

Sri Lanka brought virtual asset services within its financial transaction reporting legislation through the August 2026 amendment. Inclusion establishes AML obligations without demonstrating a general commercial licence. The proposed specific framework and mandatory provider survey must be distinguished from existing permissions for securities, banking and payments.

Index breakdown and sources

Score
Score by dimension
Framework clarityWeight: 25%Level: 2/4
Operational accessWeight: 25%Level: 1/4
TokenizationWeight: 20%Level: Pending
Service breadthWeight: 20%Level: 1/4
International reachWeight: 10%Level: 0/4

Pending evidence prevents a score and position being published. It does not mean an unfavourable assessment.

Reason

Act 17 of 2026 brings virtual asset services within the AML perimeter. The FIU survey and decision to prepare a specific framework establish neither an operational general VASP licensing route nor the rights attached to each issue.

Limits

Access and consolidated rules remain unverified. Survey participation does not equal licensing.

Sources

Key takeaways

  • The August 2026 amendment expressly includes virtual asset services within the AML perimeter.
  • Responding to the FIU survey does not grant a licence.
  • The government decision to develop a specific framework requires legislative implementation.
  • Securities rights and intermediary permissions do not arise from a token’s technical record.

Regulatory milestones

  1. CBSL public warning

    The central bank recalls payment restrictions and the absence of approvals in its notice.

  2. Mandatory provider survey

    The FIU requests information on virtual asset services.

  3. Act 17 of 2026 certified

    The financial reporting amendment includes virtual asset services.

Frequently asked questions

Act 17 of 2026 brings virtual asset services within financial reporting legislation. Inclusion establishes AML duties but does not itself establish a general commercial authorisation procedure.

No. It is an information requirement. Permissions, payment restrictions and rules governing the product and service require separate verification.

The Cabinet decision approves preparation of the framework and envisages a leading SEC role. It does not itself establish an operational VASP licensing procedure.

Act 17 of 2026 sets consequences when diligence cannot be completed: do not open the account, start the relationship or execute the transaction, or terminate an existing relationship as applicable. Suspicious reporting must also be considered.

That effect is not established. The CBSL’s 2023 notice recalls the restriction under Directions 03 of 2021. Check the proposed flow against current payment and foreign-exchange rules.

As featured in

CointelegraphInvesting.comEl EspañolEmprendedoresEl ObservadorCriptoNoticias