Skip to content

Crypto-asset regulation and tokenization in Paraguay

Regulatory overview

Scope
Paraguay
Authorities
Regulatory index
Latest regulatory change

Paraguay subjects covered providers to SEPRELAD registration and controls, without equating registration with a financial licence. Law 7572/2025 recognises securities issued through distributed ledgers while retaining activity-specific authorisation and disclosure requirements. The tax years specified in DNIT Resolution 47/2026 introduce an additional crypto-asset declaration. Each project must separate these three frameworks and establish the right represented by its token.

Index breakdown and sources

Score
Score by dimension
Framework clarityWeight: 25%Level: 2/4
Operational accessWeight: 25%Level: 2/4
TokenizationWeight: 20%Level: 3/4
Service breadthWeight: 20%Level: 2/4
International reachWeight: 10%Level: 1/4
Reason

SEPRELAD requires preventive registration and controls for covered activities, without general financial permission. Law 7572/2025 expressly recognises securities represented through distributed ledgers subject to authorisation, registration and instrument rules. DNIT adds tax reporting from the years specified in 47/2026; it is neither a licence nor an international passport.

Limits

Preventive registration without a general prudential licence. Conditional DLT securities recognition; no authorised tokenized infrastructure or general cross-border access is established. The USD 5,000 tax threshold does not apply to every platform.

Key takeaways

  • SEPRELAD regulates money-laundering prevention; DNIT administers tax information.
  • Law 7572/2025 includes securities issued or recorded using distributed ledger technology.
  • The USD 5,000 threshold is not a general exemption for local platforms.
  • A tax declaration neither authorises a public offering nor validates token rights.

Blockchain development in Paraguay

Regulatory milestones

  1. Crypto-asset information declaration established

    DNIT issues General Resolution 47/2026, with differentiated reporting persons and applicable tax years; it does not constitute a financial licence.

Frequently asked questions

Resolution 47/2026 separates local platform operators from certain residents using foreign platforms or no platform. The threshold belongs to the second case.

No. Tax information does not replace preventive registration or financial and securities permissions.

Resolution 47/2026 excludes instruments regulated under securities laws. Product classification is necessary before applying the tax definition.

No. Verify instrument, offering and infrastructure conditions alongside the effectiveness of holder rights.

The campaign’s name is insufficient. Assess recipients, distribution and terms under securities rules.

As featured in

CointelegraphInvesting.comEl EspañolEmprendedoresEl ObservadorCriptoNoticias